CG REPORT 8: Understanding Definitions and Reporting of Deaths Attributed to COVID-19 in the UK – Evidence from FOI Requests
Download Full PDF | medRxiv | Access Data
Death is a widely used outcome to assess the severity of pandemics. Accuracy in assigning the cause of death is of vital importance to define the impact of the agent, monitor its evolution and compare its threat with those of other agents. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been widespread reporting of aggregate death data with little attention paid to the accuracy over the assignment of causation.
We aimed to analyse public authorities’ understanding of the assignment of cause of deaths during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in the UK by accessing Freedom of Information requests posed in 2020-21. By public authorities, we mean NHS Health Trusts, laboratories, and government agencies such as Public Health England and the Department of Health and Social Care. We searched WhatDoTheyKnow using the terms “covid and death” to understand the ascertainment and cause of deaths in the UK. We excluded those requests to bodies that cannot provide an answer (e.g. Councils) and those dealing with the effects of vaccines.
We grouped questions into themes addressing the definitions and causes of death relevant to the pandemic. We looked at the responses to the questions of the definition of cause of death, the accuracy of the attribution, the role of other pre-existing pathologies and how these were reported and quantified.
We found 800 requests, from over 90 individuals.
• There was no consistency in the definition of cause of death or contributory cause of death across national bodies and in different bodies within the same nation.
• We found 14 different ways of attributing the causes of death mentioned by respondents.
• In care homes in England 1,304 out of 17,264 COVID-19 (7.6%, range 0% to 63%) mentioned COVID 19 in the absence of contributory or other factors in the death certificate, making it impossible to ascertain a chain of causality.
• Some responses indicate that SARS-CoV-2 negative individuals were classified as “COVID-19 deaths”.
• Nursing home providers, as well as medical practitioners, can assign a cause of death according to the Care Quality Commission.
• Post mortem examinations were uncommon; the ONS did not incorporate their results in the summary of deaths by cause during the pandemic period.
• The meaning of the words “test” or “swab” was never clarified by any of the respondents.
The inconsistencies already noted hinder the ascertainment of the role of each factor leading to death and the quantification of the importance of infection.
The overall lack of consistency has confused the public and likely led to erroneous conclusions. We are unable to separate the effects on deaths of SARS-CoV-2 from those of human interventions. A coherent process based on consistent definitions across the devolved nations is required. Furthermore, to enhance the accuracy of causation in pandemics, a subset of deaths should be verified using autopsies with full medical documentation.